`with The Demands On Education Through No Child Left Behind Every System Must Be Assured They Are Getting The Most For Their Money

With the demands on information through No peasant go forth Behind every agreement must be assured they atomic number 18 getting the most for their moneyThe new uprightness on direction signed in 2002 , to a fault called No pincer left-hand(a) Behind spiel , was meant to implement far-reaching reforms in the education sector . President provide dry landd that education was an all important(p) priority for the administration , and although education is primarily a state and local responsibility , the federal government is partially at fault for tolerating . abysmal results (White nominate , 2002 . stock-still , quaternion historic period from then , many people atomic number 18 dissatisfied with the results of the initiativeThus , in a recent discussion at the Hickman High tutor Speak Your Mind Forum , panelists concur that one of the much contentious aspects of the mo is the designation of passing play qualified teachers (Siegel 2006 . many teachers in the state received notes that they are not postgraduately qualified even though many of them held win s degrees alike , teachers are offered relatively little bear to superintend with high demands , a circumstance that can hardly embolden productivity and creativity in their workIn addition , students are also pain problems with more(prenominal) rigorous curriculum (Siegel , 2006 . Many of them cannot escape it since they do not have enough qualified support from their teachersOverall , the act was meant to accomplish a positive outcome .

However , it has cut down flexibility in the educational system , and , although implementing more soaked requirements , provided little support in their credit . No Child Left Behind bite institutes more stringent requirements for tests as well however , here it faces a problem with conformity since states hold authority over the educational process quite of the federal government . Therefore , the act does not tackle high standards even though it was aimed to break educationReferencesSiegel , J (2006 , November 15 . Panelists dissatisfied with No Child Left Behind Act . Missourian News . Retrieved November 18 , 2006 , from http /columbiamissourian .com /news / floor .php ?ID 22882White House (2002 . Foreword by President George W . Bush . Retrieved November 18 , 2006 , from http /www .whitehouse .gov /news /reports /no-child-left-behind .htmlPAGEPAGE 1NO CHILD LEFT BEHINDNovember 18 , 2006...If you want to get a full essay, order it on o ur website: BestEssayCheap.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: cheap essay